All accepted papers will also be presented in a proceedings session with live Q&A. accepted. In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. The conference organizers welcome your contributions and insights. In-person proceedings sessions will take place between 1100 and 1800 KST. Archival vs. Non-archival Submissions ACM FAccT 2023 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: FAccT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency Fairness, Equality, and Power in Algorithmic Decision-Making. Please upload only one document, appending any appendices or supplementary material to the end of the submission. In this paper, we investigate such online A/B/n Increasingly, programming tasks involve automating and deploying sensitive decision-making processes that may have adverse impacts on individuals or groups of people. proceedings, if they are accepted. Providing thorough peer reviews/cross-reviews for the track chair to, understand the submission at a high level, and. In cases where the Program Chairs (PC) have concerns about the ethics of the work in a submission, the PC will consider the ethical soundness and justification of the submission, just as it does its technical soundness. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT) A computer science conference with a cross-disciplinary focus that brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. Reviews are due by March 21 11:59 pm AoE. This document is addressed at program chairs, track chairs, and program committee members. The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. Authors must omit their names and affiliations Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. Note: If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Track Chair as early as possible in the process. For Track Chairs and Program Chairs, it provides a basis for decision-making about a submission. This typically corresponds to about 8,000 words for the main The claims/arguments are explored in sufficient depth. What kinds of marginalization are relevant to The second ensures that we are rigorous in our assessment, transparent in our decision-making, and investing in future submissions to ACM FAT* or associated conferences. Two natural and competing notions of fairness might be to a) charge each individual Spurious features interfere with the goal of obtaining robust models that perform well across many groups within the population. (Acceptance rate: 24%) [C3] Charles Marx*, Richard Phillips*, Sorelle A. Friedler, Carlos Scheidegger, and Suresh Venkatasub-ramanian. publication archive. Many parts of this guide have been inspired by or outright lifted from the excellent NIPS Reviewer, AC & SAC Guidelines. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. personal and professional concern, but also a perennial focus of FAccT These include: compliance with applicable laws, respect for privacy, secure storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent when appropriate, avoiding deceptive practices when not essential, beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc disclosure of audits. Though familiar at first blush, it lacks a single precise meaning. field address the problems and opportunities of intersectional Keep in mind that reviewers are not obligated to read the appendix or supplementary materials. reconsider their reviews and scores in light of rebuttals before final ensuring that submitting to FAccT would not be in violation of the For media inquiries, please contact press@facctconference.org; [1] to ensure that authors receive high quality feedback on their submissions. USA, Front matter (Title, Copyright, Welcome from the General Chairs, Welcome from the Program Chairs, Contents), FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Black Feminist Musings on Algorithmic Oppression, Price Discrimination with Fairness Constraints, Fairness Violations and Mitigation under Covariate Shift, Reasons, Values, Stakeholders: A Philosophical Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence, Allocating Opportunities in a Dynamic Model of Intergenerational Mobility, Corporate Social Responsibility via Multi-Armed Bandits, Biases in Generative Art: A Causal Look from the Lens of Art History, Designing an Online Infrastructure for Collecting AI Data From People With Disabilities, Fifty Shades of Grey: In Praise of a Nuanced Approach Towards Trustworthy Design, Representativeness in Statistics, Politics, and Machine Learning, The Distributive Effects of Risk Prediction in Environmental Compliance: Algorithmic Design, Environmental Justice, and Public Policy, Computer Science Communities: Who is Speaking, and Who is Listening to the Women? Reviewers will use HotCRP to set conflicts, areas of interest and sub-disciplines, bid for papers, submit your reviews, and participate in discussion. deadlines are at 11:59 PM Anywhere On Earth on the given date. context but not reduce a submission's chance of acceptance. FAccT (previously FAT*) is dedicated to the inherent risks that come with the increasing adoption of data-driven algorithmic decision making systems in socially consequential domains such as policing, criminal justice, health care and education. Learning resource allocation policies from observational data with an application to homeless services delivery. Conspicuously absent from the literature is a rigorous treatment of public trust in AI. been previously published, or have been accepted for publication. Online presentations may be either live or pre-recorded. Archival papers last year, papers and position papers are in scope for the For questions relating to the organization of the conference as a whole, contact general-chairs@facctconference.org. Note that all submissions will have the same page length requirements and will be judged by the same quality standards, regardless of whether the authors choose the archival or non-archival option. towards more ethical computing scholarship in future years. This also provides transparency and guidance to authors interested in improving their work for the ACM FAT* audience. It builds on the success of the 2020 conference held in Barelona, and is the first conference under the new name! We welcome submissions in the following areas: We especially welcome contributions that incorporate perspectives and investigations on FAccT that are relevant to or grounded in the cultures, norms, laws, and/or sociopolitical systems from regions that are usually not featured prominently at FAccT, which has so far been composed mainly of North American and European scholarship. Thanks for contributing to FAccT 22! This booth will collect all resources (pre-recorded videos, poster, the paper itself) associated with the paper to be accessed asynchronously by all registered members of the conference, who can leave questions and comments. Access to proprietary data in A/B/n testing has been adopted by many technology companies as a data-driven approach to product design and optimization. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT). ACM FAccT uses a mutually anonymous review process. FAccT: Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. For instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the third-person. All papers will be represented by a virtual booth on the Hopin virtual conference platform (www.hopin.com). FAccT is an Claims are well supported by theoretical analysis, evidence, argument, and/or experimental results. ACM conference and as such, we will review papers in alignment with the The ACM CHI Conference, 'CHI2021', Online Virtual Conference. Final submissions will be due on January 21, 2022. Humans are the final decision makers in critical tasks that involve ethical and legal concerns, ranging from recidivism prediction, to medical diagnosis, to fighting against fake news. There are lots of free options available, here are just a few suggestions: Please try to make your presentation accessible for all. Authors can use their preferred tools to record videos. Design slides taking into account people with Dyslexia (see e.g. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT). The conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. To this end, we adopt a double-blind peer review system consisting of. The submission adequately informs the reader about the research. beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society Area chairs will be listed on the FAccT website prior to the paper submission deadline. For instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the third-person. Authors must omit their names and affiliations from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. This paper argues for more caution with the use of counterfactuals when the facts to be Subset selection algorithms are ubiquitous in AI-driven applications, including, online recruiting portals and image search engines, so it is imperative that these tools are not discriminatory on the basis of protected attributes such as gender or race. Submitted papers must be 12-15 pages (including all figures and tables) in the new single column format, plus unlimited pages for references. . The submission is clearly written and well organized. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. You may Authors will be able to make changes to their titles usability and accessibility as well as support the longevity of ACM ACM FAccT 2021 is using the submission site facct2021.hotcrp.com. Switching from archival to non-archival option after submission is discouraged, but justified requests from authors will be examined by PC Chairs on a case-by-case basis. In this setting the decision-maker's fairness policy governs the number of With rapid progress in artificial intelligence (AI), popularity of generative art has grown substantially. The author responses are intended to allow the authors to concisely identify perceived mistakes of fact or reasoning in the reviews that foundationally affect the assessment about their work. previously appeared in non-archival venues such as workshops without Review content serves two purposes. While it allows sellers to increase their profits, it also raises several concerns in terms of fairness. compare the submission to other submissions. their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their Papers on Hopin will be searchable by title, author, and will be thematically tagged. Thus, we seek an area and discipline-specific quality assessment for each submission. Google Scholar Cross Ref; conference, ACM FAccT requires a broad as well as deep set of expertise Reviewer consensus is valuable, but it is not mandatory. This year we have a dedicated LAW track and a dedicated SSH (social sciences & humanities) track, next to the CS (computer science) track (plus two more tracks, dedicated to cross-disciplinary education, and to practice and experience). This process will enable the Program In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference vised lexical semantic change detection. The ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (or CHI as it's typically called) is the premier international conference for the field of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). ACM FAT* 2020 is using the FAT Conf 2020 HotCRP. Coordinating with other reviewers and track chairs by, completing peer reviews/cross-reviews in a timely manner, and. computing in particular. proceedings, if they are accepted. IL , For example, if College A has 100,000 applicants and accepts 5,000 students, their acceptance rate is 5%. Although these systems may bring myriad benefits, they also contain inherent risks, such as codifying and entrenching biases; reducing accountability, and hindering due process; they also increase the information asymmetry between individuals whose data feed into these systems and big players capable of inferring potentially relevant information. websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social Automated systems for detecting harmful social media content are afflicted by a variety of biases, some of which originate in their training datasets. We strongly recommend that authors also read it to familiarize themselves with the reviewing process. Note that submitting research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body (IRB) may be necessary in some cases, but by itself may not be sufficient. Your overall assessment should reflect on whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. anonymous review process. Submissions that have "placeholder" titles and abstracts (e.g., "TBA") or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be deleted. and ethnic studies, migration studies, work on disability and other The analyses, tasks, theories, and/or methods are new or present new perspectives on existing work. journal: In such cases, we require authors to select the non-archival ethical considerations. However, there has been AI technology offers opportunities to expand virtual and physical access for people with disabilities. It can be tempting to comment only on the weaknesses, however, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. site by submitting a tentative title and abstract and specifying their Trusted AI literature to date has focused on the trust needs of users who knowingly interact with discrete AIs. Using elasticities to derive optimal income tax rates. Contact the Program Co-chairs: program-chairs@facctconference.org. chairs for clarification. In your response, Please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. Switching from archival to non-archival If you have a conflict of interest with a submission that is assigned to you, please contact the Track Chair immediately so that the paper can be reassigned. What constitutes a "fair" allocation of the items among them? All When consequential decisions are informed by algorithmic input, individuals may feel compelled to alter their behavior in order to gain a system's approval. in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the If you have comments that you wish to be kept confidential from the authors, you can use the Comments for PC text field. ACM FAccT maintains the confidentiality of submitted material. ACM - for attending CODS-COMAD 2022 Conference registration scholarships ICLR 2021, ICML 2021, NAACL 2021, ICWSM 2021, CVPR 2021, WiNLP EMNLP 2022 Languages English Native or bilingual. building, analysis, and practical impact alongside psychological, formal proceedings. will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are Please ensure your videos have *embedded* captions. A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out.